Out of Sight
Theory:
Trash lives on two plains; the ‘now,’ and the ‘afterlife.’ The ‘now’ is commonly externalized as litter, garbage, local, the visual and sensory perceptual, tangible overall. On this plain trash can cause many problems, the least of which, but most commonly accepted, is an eyesore. The ‘afterlife’ of trash is its continued existence, but as the unperceived and wandering; a ghost. Trash in this plain is only tangible to specific thoughts, and therefore does not often exist as such. This is the cause for the common saying ‘out of sight out of mind.’ Unless people believe in ghosts, or even catch a glimpse of one, to the common public they are not real. Sadly, trash does not literally disappear from the world as a ghost, instead it is stuck and lingers to haunt it, perhaps for ever, or at least longer than we can currently fathom or project. Although it may sound playful, it is in its haunting stage in the afterlife that trash begins to cause the real and devastating damage- but that is a very long story with years of science and literature attached, a story that I am not going to directly tell at all. The idea that most interests me is trash’s ability to transition from the ‘now’ to its havoc reeking ‘afterlife.’
While there are many guides in this transitory process, water is a common, pervasive, and inherently cyclical fairer of human waste; in this case nature is nature’s own enemy. The world has an exquisite ability to adapt, relieve, and cleans itself, at times superficially, allowing it to become overrun, abused and an illusion. The ‘illusion’ is trash disappearing, because it does not. This is rather a self harming magic show with too many volunteers.
My current investigation:
The functionality of water and watersheds, as means of shedding and cleansing the mind for what becomes out of sight. What is the process of becoming out of sight- out of mind? How can it be personalized as a continued experiential thought?
The project:
To create a portal that reveals both plains of ‘now’ and ‘afterlife,’ while revealing facilitation, fascination, and greater perception and consciousness. The ‘portal’ allows first person perspective; sound from the perspective of trash in this case. The idea is that one can no longer see it, but it stays in mind and perception. The watershed is a complex and crucial facilitator for the out of mind process, and thus should be dynamically illustrated through exemplary pleural perspectives, imagined and vivid. Overall, my hope is that the focus is on extending thought and perception, not guilt.